Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add cross chain swaps through Squid Router #1482

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

Archethect
Copy link
Contributor

Relates to:

Add cross-chain swaps to ElizaOS through Squid Router

Risks

Low

Background

What does this PR do?

Add support for cross-chain swaps through Squid Router. For now only EVM is supported, but as Squid Router also supports swaps from/to Solana and the Cosmos ecosystem, we can extend this plugin soon with this functionality.

The plugin supports both native and ERC20 cross-chain token swaps.

More info on Squid Router: https://www.squidrouter.com/

Screenshot 2024-12-26 at 23 14 37 Screenshot 2024-12-26 at 23 14 25

What kind of change is this?

Features (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Documentation changes needed?

README.md file is added which explains which .env vars to add

Testing

Where should a reviewer start?

Spin up an agent with the Squid Router plugin

Detailed testing steps

Discord username

archethect

@Archethect Archethect changed the title Feature/squid bridge Add cross chain swaps through Squid Router Dec 26, 2024
@shakkernerd shakkernerd added the Plugin_new Mark PRs that are a new plugin label Dec 26, 2024
@odilitime odilitime changed the title Add cross chain swaps through Squid Router feat: Add cross chain swaps through Squid Router Jan 3, 2025
odilitime
odilitime previously approved these changes Jan 14, 2025
@odilitime odilitime merged commit 48ef4c5 into elizaOS:develop Jan 14, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs Testing Plugin_new Mark PRs that are a new plugin
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants